This page has moved to a new address.

Think Christianly

Think Christianly

Friday, August 3, 2012

I, Smartphone and the Common Good (Video)

This is a creative way to communicate a very important truth if we care about serving and loving our neighbors (locally and globally).



"There are five primary lessons that we can learn from this video...
  • Markets bring people together without any one person in charge.
  • No one person has enough knowledge to create the things we use every day.
  • Markets allow people to use their gifts to serve others.
  • Each one of us has a role in serving the common good.
  • The innovations which markets bring can benefit all society.
We believe that how and why we work is directly connected to overall stewardship. God has gifted us with scarce resources in our mental capacities, our skills and talents, and our physical resources. Understanding how markets help us to best harness those scare resources for the common good is critical.

There are two other important implications from this video:
  1. Markets are the best form of global poverty alleviation known to date. Allowing markets to operate across the globe in the 20th and 21st centuries has lifted millions if not billions out of poverty. According to the World Bank, embracing market reforms has helped lift 400 million people out of abject poverty in China alone, because people were allowed to work. For most of us, our work takes place within the market setting, so markets are critical for allowing people to use their talents.
  2. Markets embrace the dignity inherent in our creation by allowing us to unleash our creativity. Markets allow us to be innovators, to take risks on ideas, to be entrepreneurial. Markets have made it possible for us to have electricity, air travel, indoor plumbing and even the smartphone. Those creative innovations, through the market, can make our lives easier, more efficient and less costly."
For more see this excellent website. (IFWE)

To read my interview with Institute for Faith, Work & Economics fellow Dr. Jay Richards on economics and Christianity see my book Think Christianly: Looking at the Intersection of Faith and Culture.

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 5, 2012

Were Early Christians Communist?

It is common today to hear that Acts 2 shows that Christians were in to communism. Is this true? Jay Richards has a helpful article on this:
Part of that impression came from biblical passages that seem to suggest as much: “Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common.…There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need” (Acts 4:32–35 ESV). 
Many who have read this passage have wondered if the early church was communist and the Christian ideal is communism. After all, this was the first church in Jerusalem. They were “filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly” (Acts 4:31 NIV). If they didn’t get it right, who did? 
On the surface, this looks like communism, but that’s a misreading. The details and context here are everything. 
First of all, modern communism is based on Marx’s theory of class warfare, in which the workers revolt against the capitalists—the owners of the means of production—and forcibly take control of private property. After a while, Marx predicted, the socialist state would wither away and you’d get a communist utopia in which everyone lived in peace, harmony, and preternatural freedom. There’s none of this class warfare stuff in the early church in Jerusalem, nor is private property treated as immoral. These Christians are selling their possessions and sharing freely and spontaneously. 
Second, the state is nowhere in sight. No Roman centurions are showing up with soldiers. No government is confiscating property and collectivizing industry. No one is being coerced. The church in Jerusalem was just that—the church, not the state. The church doesn’t act like the modern communist state. As Ron Sider notes, “Sharing was voluntary, not compulsory.”1 In fact, sharing by definition is voluntary. 
It’s easy to lose sight of this later in the text, though, when Peter condemns Ananias and Sapphira for keeping back some of the money they got from selling their land. If you don’t read it carefully, you might get the impression that he condemns them for failing to give everything to the collective: “Ananias.…why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and to keep back for yourself part of the proceeds of the lands? While it remained unsold, did it not remain your own? And after it was sold, was it not at your disposal? Why is it that you have contrived this deed in your heart? You did not lie to men but to God!” (Acts 5:3–4 ESV). But look closely at the text; Peter condemns them not for keeping part of the proceeds of the sale, but for lying about it. In fact, he takes for granted that the property was rightfully theirs, even after it was sold. So Peter isn’t condemning private property. 
Third, the communal life of the early church in Jerusalem is never made the norm for all Christians everywhere. In fact, it’s not even described as the norm for the Jerusalem church. What Acts is describing is an unusual moment in the life of the early church, when the church was still very small. Remember, this is the beginning of the church in Jerusalem. Thousands of new Christians probably had come from a long distance to worship in Jerusalem at Pentecost. They would have had to return home soon after their conversion if not for the extreme measures taken by the newborn church to allow these Christians to stay and be properly discipled. Given the alternatives, a mutual sharing of possessions seemed to be the best course of action. 
Compared to modern nation states, the Jerusalem church was a small community banding together against an otherwise hostile culture. The circumstances were peculiar. For all we know, this communal stage lasted six months before the church got too large. It’s unlikely that all these new Christians, many denizens of the far-flung Jewish Diaspora, stayed in Jerusalem for the rest of their lives. Many probably returned home at some point, and brought their new faith with them. 
We know from the New Testament that other churches in other cities had quite different arrangements. For instance, Paul sternly warned the Thessalonian Christians, “If a man will not work, he shall not eat” and told them to “earn the bread they eat” (2 Thess. 3: 10, 12 NIV). Apparently some new Christians had begun to take advantage of the generosity of their new brothers in the faith. That’s not an especially surprising scenario, given the effects of the Fall. So it’s no surprise that the early communal life in Jerusalem was never held up as a model for how the entire church should order its life, let alone used to justify the state confiscating private property. 
Communal living (read the rest here)

Think Christianly with Jonathan Morrow

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Was Jesus a Socialist?

Recent headlines include words / phrases like: Occupy wall street. Redistribution of wealth. Capitalism. Socialism. And now...Jesus. But what does Jesus have to do with economics? Well, everyone loves to get Jesus on their side of the argument. Here is one of the passages often cited to argue that Jesus would have been in favor of socialism (Acts 4:32-35):
"All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need."
Two pieces of advice. First, always read the biblical context. In his helpful Washington Post article, Jay Richards responds to the claim that Jesus was a socialist / marxist:

"No serious biblical scholar, or economist, would mistake the practice of the early Jerusalem church for Marxism. First of all, Marx viewed private property as oppressive, and had a theory of class warfare, in which the workers would revolt against the capitalists-the owners of the means of production-and forcibly take control of private property. After that, Marx thought, private property would be abolished, and the state would own the means of production on behalf of the people. There’s none of this business in the books of Acts. These Christians are selling their possessions and sharing freely.

Second, the state is nowhere in sight. No Roman centurions are breaking down doors and sending Christians to the lions (that was later). No government is confiscating property and collectivizing industry. No one is being coerced. The church in Jerusalem was just that-the church, not the state. The church doesn’t act like the modern communist state." (read the rest of the article)

Second read works / authors who understand the biblical worldview and take the Bible seriously (i.e., in its historical-gramatical-literary context) and who also understand economics. Here are two great options: (1) Money, Greed, and God: Why Capitalism Is the Solution and Not the Problem by Jay Richards and (2) The Virtues of Capitalism: A Moral Case for Free Markets by Scott Rae and Austin Hill. Listen to an insightful interview with Jay Richards here.

Economics is a moral issue. It is critical for Christians to understand that when it comes to economics, good intentions don't necessarily translate into good outcomes. This means that it is actually possible to do harm to people while intending good if we adopt bad economic policy. I interviewed Jay Richards about this and how economics relates to the Christian worldview here.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Why Christians favor small government

In a recent article in the Washington Post, Professor of Philosophy John Mark Reynolds offers some balanced and thoughtful reasons why Christians favor small government.
"....We reject the utopian delusions of no state and of an omni-competent state. American Christians reject any king, but King Jesus. We reject any theocracy before King Jesus returns, because humans would have to run it. We long for justice tempered with mercy and we will vote for the man or woman who will give us a government small enough to allow liberty, but big enough to preserve it."
Read the rest here.

Other resources on Christians engaging the public square in the arena of politics, click here.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, June 4, 2010

Prudence and the Poor - Is Capitalism or Socialism Better?

Addressing poverty is not just a heart issue; it's a head issue too. Sometimes things that feel good to do, don't really help.

“Prudence means “to see reality as it is, and to act accordingly,” to conform your mind, and then your actions, to reality. It’s one of the four cardinal virtues, along with justice, fortitude, and temperance. Cardinal is based on the Latin word cardo, which means “hinge.” These four virtues are cardinal because all the other virtues hinge on them. Helping the poor, for instance, hinges on prudence. That’s because, in the economic realm, actions have all sorts of unintended consequences. We can’t anticipate all of them. But we can anticipate a lot of them. Therefore, if we really want to help the poor, we have to exercise prudence—to know what the world is really like, and act accordingly.”—Jay Richards

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, January 28, 2010

The Nirvana Myth - Economics, Capitalism and Being Realistic

"The Nirvana Myth is comparing capitalism with an unrealizable idea. It's not simply the belief that good will triumph in the end or the belief that the Kingdom of God is already present--though not yet fully realized--in history. It's the delusion that we can build utopia on our won if we try hard enough. It makes every real society look intolerably wicked, since no real society can measure up to Utopia. Without this myth, the popular but deadly communist experiments of the twentieth century could never have gotten off the ground.

When we ask whether we can build a just society, we need to keep the question nailed to solid ground: "just" compared to what? It doesn't do anyone any good to tear down a society that is "unjust" compared to the Kingdom of God, if that society is more just than any of the ones that will replace it. If you compare capitalism with the live alternatives, however, capitalism wins hands down."--Jay Richards

Last night was the state of the union and of course economics came up. But we need to be realistic. There is a tension we need to acknowledge between what is and what could be...and then what is actually feasible.

For more, see Money, Greed, and God by Jay Richards



Labels: , , ,

Thursday, January 7, 2010

I came across an interesting article from the Acton Institute on Wikipedia

"Ten years ago this month, Internet entrepreneur Jimmy Wales hired Larry Sanger to develop an online encyclopedia. You may have never heard of that project, titled “Nupedia,” but you’ve probably heard of the site that emerged from its ashes. Wikipedia is not only one of the most successful initiatives in the history of the Web but also a shining example of the potential of human cooperation.

Wikipedia sprouted in the fertile soil of freedom and possibility that characterized the early days of the Internet. Andrew Lih tells the story in The Wikipedia Revolution (2009). Wales, a principal of the technology company Bomis, perceived the potential demand for an online encyclopedia and launched his new venture to fill that need. Nupedia was soon abandoned because it was the result of conventional thinking—a traditional encyclopedia model applied to the Internet. When this dawned on Wales and Sanger, the resulting creative spark ignited the Wikipedia revolution. Putting an encyclopedia on the Web should mean not merely a change in the location of encyclopedia content, they realized: the new technology could instead transform the entire process of content production and publication. This was the insight that set Wikipedia apart and soon attracted millions of people across the world to its community.

The Wikipedia experiment was an exercise in entrepreneurship, and demonstrates that the impetus for life-enhancing innovation is not merely monetary success. Wales and Sanger were motivated by a desire to promote learning and empower people. In their view, the accumulation and dissemination of knowledge should be democratic: let anyone with access to a computer participate in the process.

Traditionally, the collection and presentation of the world’s accumulated knowledge in the encyclopedia format was a jealously guarded prerogative of the gatekeepers of established publishing and academic institutions. This method had its advantages: consistency, careful review processes, and adherence to accepted standards of scholarship.

It also had its drawbacks. The updating and release of new material necessarily occurred at a glacial pace. Originality and dissent were frowned upon and non-mainstream perspectives could only find their way to print slowly, if at all. There were intrinsic limitations of scale and scope, put in place by the economics of the editorial and print process: only major topics deemed to be of interest to large numbers of people could justify the resources put into covering any given entry.

The philosophy of its founders shaped Wikipedia and supplied its unique sensibility, overturning the conventional constraints of established encyclopedias. Most critically, Wales and Sanger possessed a fundamental faith in humanity. Wikipedia is not about technology, Wales wrote in the foreword to Lih’s book, “it’s about people… it’s about trusting people, it’s about encouraging people to do good.” Detractors believed that permitting open editing of web content, or “crowdsourcing,” would result in chaos. Bias, error, and distortion would be rife. How could the anonymous interaction of the Web, they wondered, result in reliably accurate information on a wide range of topics?

But Wikipedia’s bet on the potential of free human interaction in an online community paid off. By 2008, it boasted more than 2 million articles in English, and millions more in some 250 other languages. By almost any measure it was a spectacular success.

The model pioneered by Wikipedia is not flawless. One might..." For more...

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Myths Christians Believe about Wealth and Poverty by Jay Richards

Monday, November 30, 2009

Climate Change Data Dumped Article and A Christian Perspective on the Global Warming Debate

Green used to be just a color. Now it is a way of life, big business, and the source of no small amount of scientific controversy. We are now familiar with words that don't normally go together like carbon and footprint.

So what do we make of the Global Warming Debate? From a Christian perspective, we do have a responsibility to take care of and steward God's creation (cf. Gen.1-2). But this is not always easy to sort out in the modern world or even what this looks like amidst human priorities and the various ethical and economic issues raised.

In a recent article in the Times Online, it is being pointed out that there is some curious activity surrounding the dumping of the raw data on climate change and is worth a read.

"SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.

The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.

The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data.

In a statement on its website, the CRU said: “We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenised) data.”

The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible.

Roger Pielke, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, discovered data had been lost when he asked for original records. “The CRU is basically saying, ‘Trust us’. So much for settling questions and resolving debates with science,” he said..." More...

Also, here is a helpful introduction to this topic by Dr. Jay Richards from a Christian perspective. Here are some of the key questions he addresses and that all of those involved in the global warming / climate change debate need to think carefully about. (And if the raw scientific data is not being made available to the public...this makes coming to an informed conclusion kind of difficult).
  • Is the earth warming?
  • Are we causing it?
  • If the earth is warming and we are causing it, is that bad?
  • Would the advised policies make any difference?
Click here to watch...

One final word on this. This is a contentious topic. So whatever view you hold, we need to remember to consider the evidence without demonizing the people with whom we disagree. This is the only sound way forward if progress is to be made.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, October 16, 2009

Greed Is Not Good, and It’s Not Capitalism

Here is recent article by Dr. Jay Richards clearing up a misconception that capitalism is based on greed. The reason why we post on economics here is not for a particular political ideology. It is because economics effects a lot of people...especially the poor. If America catches a cold, then many places in the world come down with pneumonia or worse.

"Capitalism doesn’t need greed. What capitalism does need is human creativity and initiative. After months of hearing the media and pundits pronounce the untimely death of capitalism, it did my heart good to see a recent Newsweek cover story challenge the familiar trope. The author, Fareed Zakaria, noted that this pessimistic pronouncement gets air time in the wake of every financial downturn. But in reality, capitalism, over the long haul, has succeeded far beyond any other economic arrangement in human history. If worldwide communism couldn’t destroy capitalism, why are we so quick to believe that some bad fiscal and government policies in real estate will do it? Unfortunately,(more...)"

Richard's book, Money, Greed, and God is thought provoking and important:



Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Ethics has fallen on hard times these days...Moral Choices by Scott Rae can help us recover our moral foundation

How does a Christian think about ethics? How can we make thoughtful, biblically informed decisions about:
  • Abortion and Embryonic Stem Cell Research
  • Reproductive Technologies
  • Biotechnology, Genetics, and Human Cloning
  • Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
  • Capital Punishment
  • Sexual Ethics
  • The Morality of War
  • Ethics and Economics
  • The Environment
If you are not sure how to answer these questions or are not convinced that the Bible has / should have anything to say about, then you need to have this book on your shelf.

On a personal note, Dr. Scott Rae was one of my professors in graduate school and he is the real deal. I have huge respect for him. Also, this book is very accessible. There is no better introduction to Christian ethics out there.


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, August 10, 2009

Should Christians be Capitalists? Jay Richards on Money, God, and Greed

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

In God We Trust? Five biblical lessons for believers during an economic recession

I came across an article written in my alma mater's magazine (Biola University). It is well written and timely. I am challenged, convicted, and given a vision for a different kind of life when I read Paul's Word's to Timothy:
“Instruct those who are rich in this present world not to be conceited or to fix their hope on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who richly supplies us with all things to enjoy. Instruct them to do good, to be rich in good works, to be generous and ready to share, storing up for themselves the treasure of a good foundation for the future, so that they may take hold of that which is life indeed.” - 1 Timothy 6:14-17

I don't know about you; but I want to find "life indeed"...not a pot of fool's gold at the end of a marketing rainbow.

In God We Trust: Five Biblical Lessons for Believers During Economic Recession by Brett McCracken

On a Tuesday last fall, sophomore visual journalism major Maylin Rowe thought for sure she was not going to be able to continue at Biola. That Friday, $2,900 was due for the spring semester’s tuition. But because an expected federal loan did not go through and her family’s finances were tight, Rowe found herself without the money and with only three days to come up with it. She thought it was time to start packing. But just as her hopes were fading for another semester at Biola, something interesting happened. Rowe’s community recognized her need. Friends went door to door in the Alpha Chi dorm, collecting loose change on her behalf. Soon there were students in other dorms giving checks - sometimes for hundreds of dollars - to keep Rowe at Biola. By Friday, Rowe was lugging 30-pound boxes of change to the bank, hopeful that it would add up to the amount she needed. It was just enough.

“There was no possibility from a human standpoint,” she said. “It was miraculous.” Rowe was in disbelief, but knew God was sending her a message: Just trust me.

Maylin’s story reminds us that, in times of financial uncertainty and stress, important lessons can be learned. Wisdom can be gained. Faith can be strengthened. The assertion that “all things work together for good for those who love God” isn’t just a platitude to help us get through hard times; it’s a galvanizing announcement that God has a purpose for this recession and is working things out to that end. We just have to pay attention to see what we can learn about the “good” for which it is all working.

The following are five ideas of what that good might be - five lessons, reminders and biblical thoughts that represent an upside to this economic downturn.

1. God, not money, is our security

“We were so utterly burdened beyond our strength that we despaired of life itself. Indeed, we felt that we had received the sentence of death. But that was to make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead.” (2 Corinthians 1:8-9)

When things are easy and prosperous, we tend to rely on ourselves. But when crises happen and our 401(k)s evaporate, our self-reliance and “security” are thrown into doubt. In hard times, we realize that there is very little in life that we actually have control over. Perhaps this is the first lesson we should learn from this recession: Our God, not our resources, provides security.

The financial industry speaks of security often in terms of retirement accounts, social safety nets and the stock market. We even use the word “securities” to refer to a type of investment, something financial planner and Biola alumnus Peter Falk (’97) finds troubling.

“It’s tempting for Christians to view the stock market or investments as security,” said Falk. “But you have to remind yourself that while these things can be beneficial, you can’t take them with you.”

We should also remember that up until about 100 years ago, retirement accounts and government provided social safety nets were not commonplace. For most of history, people were dependent on God and family, notes Steve Rundle, an economics professor in Biola’s Crowell School of Business.

Rundle thinks we’ve gotten away from that now, and instead we turn to the government or ourselves for security. It’s a mentality found in churches too, said Rundle, where there are often financial seminars that emphasize how to manage a nest egg and learn to be financially self-sufficient.

“There’s an underlying emphasis in many of these seminars on becoming totally independent and not needing anybody - including God,” said Rundle. “And I think this crisis is showing us the folly of all that.”

Certainly, a crisis like this is a wakeup call to Christians who fall into the trap of self-sufficiency.

In a recent sermon about the financial crisis, pastor and author John Piper put it this way: “At the bottom of every Christian heart - no matter how advanced in faith and godliness - there is the sediment of self reliance. Then God shakes our lives, sometimes to the foundations, to show us our self-reliance and clean it out with a new, deeper reliance on him.”

2. We are stewards, not owners

“The earth is the LORD’s and the fullness thereof, the world and those who dwell therein.” (Psalm 24:1)

Another important lesson of a recession is the reminder that everything we have or think we “own” is not really ours at all. It’s God’s. When we look at our money in this way, we can’t help but be more conscious of how we use it.

Whether we’re talking about the environment or a paycheck, Christians must recognize that we must be wise stewards, said Mike Wilkins, distinguished professor of New Testament at Talbot School of Theology.

“If we view ourselves simply and solely as stewards of God’s grace, then we never hold on to anything too tightly,” said Wilkins. “I think it’s a wonderful opportunity for us to see ourselves as instruments of God.”

But what does stewardship actually mean for Christians in their everyday lives?

According to Falk, it means that we fundamentally approach money differently, as a tool that we are entrusted with to use for God. It means living within our means and viewing our money as God’s, and giving faithfully back to him.

This is an area where Christians could do better. Giving averages for evangelicals in the United States hover between 2 percent and 3 percent of gross income, even while most recognize 10 percent as the biblical ideal. And with the financial crisis bearing down on most wallets, some Christians are giving even less than normal.

But when money is tight, it doesn’t mean believers should stop giving. It means we should focus on our best investments and think about “what is going to be the most eternal bang for the buck,” said Falk.

This is good stewardship evaluating where our money goes and being sure to get the biggest “Kingdom R.O.I.” possible, said Rick Bee, senior director of alumni relations, who teaches a popular “Faith and Money” class every year at Biola.

As part of the class, which focuses on a biblical approach to finances, Bee gives each student $30 and instructs them to use it however they want - as long as it reflects the stewardship values they’ve learned in the class. Students also spend a class period playing Monopoly “as Christians,” where the goal is not to amass money or houses, but to acquire eternal rewards. The class, said Bee, “is meant to get students thinking with more of an eternal perspective.”

Having that eternal perspective - seeing that our role in the bigger picture of God’s plan is one of stewardship and not ownership - frees us from the bondage of money that enslaves so many. And it also invariably grows our faith.

3. Faith grows in tough times

“Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them.” (Matthew 6:25-26)

Most everyone was affected when the markets took their tumble last October, and Biola was not immune. Freshman Carissa Bixler was hit especially hard. She’s a missionary kid from Indonesia, and her parents are fully funded by the support of churches. As the recession worsened last fall, support began to wane. With two other brothers and a sister studying at other colleges, the financial burden for the family was immense. Bixler wasn’t sure she could come up with enough money for another semester at Biola.

Meanwhile, Biola responded to the financial crisis by commissioning a cross-departmental task force to address the immediate financial needs of students. Out of this came the Student Emergency Relief Fund (SERF), which raised nearly $150,000 to provide special scholarships to students who had been directly affected by the economic crisis and needed emergency funding in order to stay at Biola. Carissa was one of about 150 students who qualified and received scholarships. Her need was met because her community was generous. Biola alumni, staff, faculty, donors ... they all contributed to the fund.

It was a powerful dose of God’s providence.

“It’s not only how great God is and the great big things he can do, but also the great little things he can do,” said Bixler. “Money is a little thing, and God is still taking care of it.”

For Bixler - and indeed, for those who generously gave money to the fund that supported her - the experience was an exercise in trusting in God’s faithfulness. In times like this, when it’s hard to see how even God could make the math work, faith becomes all the more important.

“This is a season we can look back on as one of the great learning times of our faith,” said Biola’s president, Barry H. Corey. “We can walk forward with assurance that these are the times God shows up in faithful and even staggering ways.”

One of the ways Christians can build faith is to remain generous in giving, even if we don’t think we can afford to, said Rick Bee.

“Now’s the time for us to really step out in faith and support those organizations or individuals that are really having trouble,” said Bee. “It’s a great test for us. Do we trust that God will provide for our needs?”

While the rest of the world loses faith in their governments, banks and even themselves, what a testimony it would be if Christians grew in faith - if, while the rest of the world divested, Christians invested in God’s work. When everything in the world says we should worry more, what if Christians worried less?

It would be quite the message.

4. We must generously and lovingly meet the needs of others

“There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.” (Acts 4:33-35)

What was going on with the early church of Acts 4? Was it some nascent form of Christian socialism? Some naive utopian vision of communal living?

No, says Mike Wilkins. It was the radical in-breaking of the kingdom of God.

“It was a realignment of values,” said Wilkins. Everything the early Christians thought they knew about individual self-interest was undermined in the call to seek first the kingdom of God. Because Jesus rose from the dead, everything changed. The early church responded to the resurrection by becoming givers rather than takers, stewards rather than owners, other-centered rather than self-centered. They became generous in new, radical ways, because of Christ’s generous act. And as a result, there was “not a needy person among them.”

But ever since the first century, the church has had a hard time living like the Christians of Acts 4.

“I think every generation has to relearn the kingdom mentality of the early church,” said Wilkins, who suggests that whenever we think about money as Christians, we should start not with our own needs but with those of others.

And when better to illustrate these kingdom values than in a recession, when so many in our families, churches and communities are in need of support?

But compassion goes beyond supporting our own communities; it also means that we reach out and help needy people wherever we find them. It means that we give away whatever we can, whenever we can, to ease the burden of others.

American Christians are a rich group. By some estimates, churchgoing American Christians collectively earn more than $2.5 trillion dollars every year. If they were a country, they’d be invited to G7 summits. But what are Christians doing with all this money? One thing they’re not doing - at least not to the extent they could - is giving.

If all American Christians gave 10 percent of their after-tax income back to the church, it would pump some $46 billion into Christian ministry on an annual basis, according to statistics on Christian giving in the book Passing the Plate. And if every Christian in the whole world did it, imagine the global humanitarian needs that could be met!

We have been greatly blessed. There are many who are in great need. It’s just a question of how much we are willing to give up.

5. We can learn to live with less

“No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will hold to one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.” (Matthew 6:24)

It’s part of the reason we got into this financial crisis, and it’s one of the things that must be addressed if we want to get out: our obsession with always wanting more.

On an individual and national level, Americans spend more money than they make, borrowing money they can’t repay and buying things they can’t afford. It’s something that can’t be sustained, says Rundle, who thinks the recession is a wakeup call for people to “get a grip on their finances and live more simply.”

The problem of over-the-top consumption is always going to be a problem in capitalism, because capitalism is imperfect and people are fallen, said Scott Rae, a business ethicist and Talbot professor of philosophy of religion and ethics. But that doesn’t mean that we should throw the baby out with the bathwater.

It’s not unethical to spend money, said Rae, “but we must remember that there’s more to life than accumulating stuff.”

Katrina Greene, an anthropology professor in Biola’s Cook School of Intercultural Studies, puts consumerism under the microscope every fall in her “Economy, Society & Values” class, which uses as a textbook Arthur Simon’s How Much is Enough: Hungering for God in an Affluent Culture.

In the class, students are encouraged to ask questions about what consumerism means in their lives. Do we identify ourselves through the things we buy, like clothing, cars and music? How much is enough? Is our thirst for “more” ever satisfied?

Greene, an economic anthropologist, emphasizes the contrast between American economic values like individualism with other cultures where there might be more of an emphasis on the welfare of the group.

“When you see other cultures, you can see how priorities are different,” she said. “We might learn from cultures where it’s not all about us and what we want, but where our identity is bound up in others, moving through life as a group, helping each other.”

---

At the end of the day, as we lament the bad economy and all that it means for our shrinking wallets, the truth is we have it pretty good. For billions around the world, our “recession” looks like an economic boom. The developing world is constantly living in a recession that is deeper and more desperate than America’s current situation.

And while we shouldn’t minimize the pain that many are going through in our own communities, hopefully these times will provide the affluent West with more empathy for the poor and marginalized in the rest of the world.

“Many people in the West are dealing with issues of unemployment and extreme financial hardship for the first time in their lives,” said Greene. “But many people in the rest of the world deal with issues of poverty and financial struggle every day.”

So perhaps above all, the recession offers us a bit of perspective: Money is important, but it isn’t everything. It isn’t ours, but it is ours to use for God.

It’s a wakeup call to get our priorities in order. It’s a reminder to seek first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness, and to move forward with confidence that God will bless our faithfulness.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Money, Greed, and God: Why Capitalism Is the Solution and Not the Problem by Jay Richards

I am reading a fascinating book right now on economics and christian thought. Richards takes on common myths about capitalism (so far, he is making a compelling case)....more to come.

Money, Greed, and God: Why Capitalism Is the Solution and Not the Problem by Jay Richards

Review
"In Money, Greed, and God, Jay Richards has written the definitive case for capitalism, a crisply written and incisive discourse on wealth and poverty, money and morality for the 21st Century." (George Gilder, co-founder of the Discovery Institute and author of Wealth and Poverty )

"Jay Richards understands the objections to capitalism, and here explains why they do not convince him. The empirical findings revealed in Money, Greed, and God run against those objections." (Michael Novak, Chair in Religion and Public Policy at the American Enterprise Institute )

Product Description

Does capitalism promote greed? Can a person follow Jesus's call to love others and also support capitalism? Was our recent economic crisis caused by flaws inherent to our free market system? Jay Richards presents a new approach to capitalism, revealing how it's fully consistent with Jesus's teachings and the Christian tradition, while also showing why this system is our best bet for renewed economic vigor.

The church is bombarded with two competing messages about money and capitalism:

  • wealth is bad and causes much of the world's suffering
  • wealth is good and God wants you to prosper and be rich

Richards exposes these myths, and other common misconceptions about capitalism, and reveals the surprising ways that capitalism is, in fact, the best system to respond to the biblical mandates of alleviating poverty and protecting the environment. Money, Greed, and God equips readers to take practical steps in their own lives to conduct business, worship God, and serve others without falling into the "prosperity gospel" trap.

(from Amazon)

Labels: , , , ,